Forum Home → Discussion → Universal credit administration → Thread
Universal Credit Project Assessment Reviews - recurring themes in the reviews - Parliamentary publications
Daphne, Shawn, and Stuart if this has been published on Rightsnet apologies.
But just in case!
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmworpen/740/74007.htm
‘The IPA found a high level of uncertainty about the proportion of UC claimants who could be considered vulnerable, noting that estimates ranged from 25% to 50%. Given the resources required to support vulnerable claimants, if levels were towards the top end of that scale the medium-term sustainability of UC would be threatened’.
33.‘The IPA’s call for the “industrialisation” of UC for complex cases and vulnerable customers is an unfortunate choice of phrase. In those stark terms, however, it epitomises the challenges facing the UC programme. To make its promised efficiency gains, it must become a far more automated system. Key areas such as identity verification, however, are currently manual processes for a large proportion of claimants. Delays to the rollout and automation of the digital service reduce projected efficiency savings. In seeking to maximise savings, however, the Department must monitor closely any potential adverse effects on claimants and factor those into its decision making’.