× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Housing costs  →  Thread

Can my client claim UC Housing costs for his flat and claim HB for his residential rehabilitation supported accomodation?

CER
forum member

Middlesbrough Welfare Rights Unit

Send message

Total Posts: 8

Joined: 28 June 2010

I have a client who is renting a LA flat for which he receives UC housing costs.
He is going to be staying in a residential rehab for up to 6 months. Can he claim housing benefit for this rent in addition to UC on his flat.

Thanks

Kelly
Administrator

rightsnet editor

Send message

Total Posts: 57

Joined: 8 April 2024

Good question!

I guess UC HCE may continue whilst client is temporarily absent from his LA flat for up to 6 months, and rehab could count as ‘specified accommodation’ for HB. However, your client would have two homes…

From the info you’ve shared, it doesn’t seem that your client satisfies the conditions for either UC HCE or HB to receive benefit for more than one dwelling (fear of violence, delay moving due to disability adapatation, large family requiring 2 properties). So each benefit would require the client to be in occupation of only one of the dwellings.

It doesn’t seem likely that your client could be treated as occupying the LA flat for one benefit and as occupying the rehab centre for another…

Mr Jim
forum member

Asylum & Roma Team, Social Work Services, Glasgow City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 147

Joined: 25 April 2017

Hi,

See the attached. First two paragraphs should be relevant UK wide. The rest relates to Scotland only.

Jim

File Attachments

HB Anorak
forum member

Benefits consultant/trainer - hbanorak.co.uk, East London

Send message

Total Posts: 2959

Joined: 12 March 2013

I’m not convinced by what that document says about rehab for no longer than six months.  As Kelly says, the only way that both HB and UC housing costs could be paid would be if DWP and HB took different views about where the claimant normally lives, and this cannot be taken for granted.

That is the whole problem in cases like this: there is an obvious difficulty in saying to UC “this is still the accommodation which I normally occupy as my home, but I’m temporarily absent for no longer than six months”, while saying to HB “this is the dwelling I normally occupy as my home so I want to claim HB for it”.  On the face of it, those statements cannot both be true, but since you are dealing with different decision makers in different jurisdictions there is a chance they might see it that way and there would be nothing unlawful about that.  But the document in the link above implies this is a guaranteed dual entitlement - it’s not.

Mr Jim
forum member

Asylum & Roma Team, Social Work Services, Glasgow City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 147

Joined: 25 April 2017

But in Scotland!