Forum Home → Discussion → Income support, JSA and tax credits → Thread
What percentage of sanctions are actually appealed?
forum member
Advice, Archway, Renew Leeds
Total Posts: 38
Joined: 23 January 2014
I have read somewhere without any corroboration that only 2% of clients actually make it to appeal with a JSA sanction issue
It is presented elsewhere variously that 53 -58% of those that go to appeal are found for the claimant. Is that just JSA or ESA and JSA?
Anybody got stats on this or can direct me to a reliable source?
Thank you
forum member
Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council
Total Posts: 2262
Joined: 15 October 2012
forum member
Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council
Total Posts: 2262
Joined: 15 October 2012
DManville - 04 April 2014 12:22 PMIt’s on stat-xplore on dwp.gov.uk but you need to register
and I had promised myself I would have a play with this… See spreadsheet below
Sadly it won’t put the decision outcome in the same table as the reconsidered/appealed sheet.
[ Edited: 4 Apr 2014 at 12:42 pm by Dan_Manville ]File Attachments
- numbers_of_sanction_appealed_recon.xlsx (File Size: 25KB - Downloads: 319)
- decision_outcomes.xlsx (File Size: 25KB - Downloads: 299)
forum member
Advice, Archway, Renew Leeds
Total Posts: 38
Joined: 23 January 2014
Thank you DManville. I have to admit I am still trying to get my head round those stats. It appears they have randomised the categories column which is a little bewildering. Using the average of appeals over original in the lower level sanctions gives an average of less than 1% actually appealed. This is astonishingly low.
The second spreadsheet figures (outcomes) don’t add up across the rows.
forum member
Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council
Total Posts: 2262
Joined: 15 October 2012
AidanG - 04 April 2014 02:13 PMThank you DManville. I have to admit I am still trying to get my head round those stats. It appears they have randomised the categories column which is a little bewildering. Using the average of appeals over original in the lower level sanctions gives an average of less than 1% actually appealed. This is astonishingly low.
The second spreadsheet figures (outcomes) don’t add up across the rows.
I don’t intend to try to work them out however I played with the ESA stats too and the proportion of decisions challenged looked to be significantly higher which is probably what’s pushed the average reported to the heady heights of 2%.
You’re right; it is astonishingly low, a lot of people; especially with the low level sanctions, I suspect just suck it up, not appreciating that an appeal is an important tool both for activism’s sake as well as to hopefully get their money back.
But where’s the incentive? By the time the appeal’s come round they’ve got their award back in most cases and mitigated the direct effects of the sanction; I wonder how many people actually attend appeal hearings or let their case get struck out at enquiry form stage.
forum member
Advice, Archway, Renew Leeds
Total Posts: 38
Joined: 23 January 2014
I wonder too, about the number of clients that are “gatekept” from the chance to get an independent body to look at their case. I feel many clients accept the MR phone call route as the only answer they are going to get.
I think even less people challenge adverse hardship decisions.
forum member
Advisor - Wirral Welfare Rights Unit, Birkenhead
Total Posts: 472
Joined: 18 June 2010
I spoke to a JSA DM yesterday, who was amazed that we don’t deal with lots of JSA sanction appeals - I said that most of the sanctions handed out were probably to young single people, which he agreed was the case. As above, I think most just claim local welfare assistance and hardship payments to deal with any fall out from the decisions, rather than look to a long, drawn out appeal process.