Discussion archive

Top Other benefit issues topic #2153

Subject: "What do you think?" First topic | Last topic
G Lonergan
                              

Caseworker/Supervisor, CLS Direct Norwich Money Advice
Member since
13th Jul 2004

What do you think?
Wed 20-Sep-06 01:57 PM

Can this really be happening?

DWP, Rightsnet and Disability Alliance sing from same sheet
19.09.06


A report which the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) claims is 'independent' and which shows that 'being out of work is bad for both mind and body' was written by an academic who has close links both with scandal hit American employment insurance giant UnumProvident and with the DWP. It's findings were, however, uncritically reproduced by two major welfare benefits websites.

Waddell's Wonder Diet?
Professor Gordon Waddell conducted a review of more than 400 pieces of scientific evidence in the course of compiling his report Is work good for your health and well-being? He concluded that being out of work causes increased rates of mental health problems as well as an increased risk of suicide, disability and obesity. According to the DWP, however, he also discovered that "this can be reversed - when people return to work from unemployment their health improves by as much as unemployment damages it." (This may be the first time that employment has been suggested as an alternative to dieting and does make this author wonder how a period of record employment has managed to coincide with record levels of obesity. Perhaps people simply aren't working long or hard enough?)

The report also claims that there is a lack of understanding amongst healthcare professionals of the benefits of work. A series of initiatives is thus being planned by the government to help educate GPs to understand the long-term consequences of signing people off sick and the role they can play in helping their patients remain in, or return to, work.

Professor Waddell's findings caused a delighted DWP Minister, Lord Hunt to enthuse that:

'This review reinforces our commitment to helping more people into work, improving the health of working age people and tackling the root causes of ill health."

Waddell's Signs
What the DWP press release, or the resulting pieces even on such specialist websites as Disability Alliance and Rightsnet, failed to mention, however, was the Professor's own background.

Professor Waddell is well known to many welfare rights workers. Waddell's Signs are used by DWP doctors to identify allegedly malingering claimants who are assumed to be exaggerating their low back problems. Professor Waddell also has a long history of working with Professor Mansell Aylward CB, former Chief Scientist at the DWP and now Chair of the UnumProvident Centre for Psychosocial and Disability Research. The primary aim of the Centre is to reduce the number of people signed off sick by GPs, to the financial benefit of both the DWP and UnumProvident. So close is the relationship between the two professors, that not only is Professor Waddell an Honorary Professor at Professor Aylward's Centre, but they have even written books together.

The most recent of these is The Scientific and Conceptual Basis of Incapacity Benefits. In January of this year UnumProvident hosted the launch of the book which, in an uncanny echo of government policy, concludes that up to one million incapacity benefit recipients could potentially return to work. As well as changes to the incapacity benefit system, the book also proposes "a whole new approach to the overriding issue of workplace absence arising from sickness and disability". Which might be quite handy if, like UnumProvident, you lose profits when people go sick.


The press release for the book launch explained that:

"UnumProvident has long campaigned for reforms of the Incapacity Benefit system and welcomed the proposals outlined in the recent IB Green Paper."

What the press release didn't mention is that in the United States a scandal hit UnumProvident has already paid $15 million to compensate people it allegedly carried out improper medical assessments on, and has agreed to reopen another 215,000 claims.

Unvarnished
Not everyone may find it reassuring that an American insurance company currently facing such massive claims for unfair medical assessments has been actively campaigning to change the British benefits system in a way which is to its financial advantage. Nor will everyone be convinced that Professor Waddell is 'independent' in the way that they understand that word. And finally, not everyone will find it encouraging that organisations such as Disability Alliance and Rightsnet are happy to uncritically reproduce extracts from a DWP press release as if it were the unvarnished truth.

Rightsnet members will find the story in the News section, dated September 12th.

You can read the paragraph and link on Disability Alliance's site.


© 2006 Steve Donnison

  

Top      

Replies to this topic
RE: What do you think?, jj, 20th Sep 2006, #1
RE: What do you think?, fkaGerry2, 22nd Sep 2006, #2
      RE: What do you think?, fkaGerry2, 22nd Sep 2006, #3
      RE: What do you think?, nevip, 22nd Sep 2006, #5
      RE: What do you think?, Martin_Williams, 22nd Sep 2006, #4
           RE: What do you think?, nevip, 22nd Sep 2006, #6
                RE: What do you think?, nevip, 22nd Sep 2006, #7
                     RE: What do you think?, Martin_Williams, 22nd Sep 2006, #8
                          RE: What do you think?, nevip, 22nd Sep 2006, #9
                               RE: What do you think?, fkaGerry2, 22nd Sep 2006, #10
                                    RE: What do you think?, nevip, 22nd Sep 2006, #11

jj
                              

welfare rights adviser, saltley & nechells law centre birmingham
Member since
21st Jan 2004

RE: What do you think?
Wed 20-Sep-06 05:08 PM

i haven't been able to quickly track down a copy of the report - it is apparently a review of 400 pieces of evidence - it would be interesting to see how they all join up together. another interesting story is Atos Origin's new IT contract for the Appeals Service computer system. gosh! expertise in medical services _and_ software development.

how fortuitous! anyone would think that there are companies absolutely dedicated to doing the work of government, just waiting for the government to decide it can be done by said patiently waiting companies. or less than waiting patiently companies, taking your point about US-style hard-core lobbying. all in the name of better deal for the tax payer, of course.

what has happened to the welfare state? is the word nobody wants to utter 'corruption'?

meanwhile the Health Secretary denies the goal of privatisation, and insistes that getting the private sector to help out public services is consistent with the founding values of the NHS. !!!!

Austin Mitchell MP is trying to find out from Ruth Kelly ("Citizens should be able to put forward their ideas and views, certain they will be heard." ) why an elected tenants' representative was told by officials that tenants were not invited to a regional consultation meeting "From Decent Homes to Sustainable Communities, citing Government claims that iit does not regard tenants as 'stakeholders'. Bon chance Austin!

Searching on the internet for something else i came across the following document by chance, in that strange internet search way - it's called 'An introduction to our healthcare team' but is actually a resume from a big FU firm of solicitors, and it's worth a skim, just for the insights into the scale of PFI, oh, and the range of activities that can come under a healthcare 'title'.


http://www.nabarro.com/Downloads/416.pdf

talking of which, i was interested in finding out why Lord Carter was appointed (to create a market in legal aid provision. this could be funny if it wasn't so tragic. duh! legal aid was started because the market in legal work had already priced out the poor!!! ) or even made a life peer...

found out he started at Hambro's Bank, and founded Westminster Health care which i believe was originally a residential care homes business...

http://www.cppseminars.org.uk/site/dpb.cfm?do=ref&fldCPPSref=SAH/73&fldNameID=14596&varDetProgBiog=biog

http://www.legalaidprocurementreview.gov.uk/biogs.htm

what a bunch of creamers!

somebody, pinch me, am i dreaming that i am hungarian!

on the other issue




  

Top      

fkaGerry2
                              

Deputy Manager, Sheffield Advice Link
Member since
20th Dec 2005

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 07:43 AM

I think Steve Donnison's work stands scrutiny with the best in our field, and I share his scepticism about the contents and provenance of this report. But I do part company with him on the implication that rightsnet and Disability Alliance have in any sense endorsed the report.

rightsnet has a long history of "straight" reporting on DWP and other government pronouncements. It's for the rest of us, in these forums, to engage critically with their contents; and yes, this time we were all slow to do so. But that's not rightsnet's fault. And the intro to the link on the DA site to the report specifically invites users to "read and make up your own mind". I don't find either to amount to uncritical endorsement.

As for the subject matter of the report itself - I think Tressel got it right. Can't provide a quote - its one of those books I've lent out so many times I no longer have a copy - but the gist was "if work is so damn wonderful, how come the rich don't hog the lions share of it for themselves, like they do with all the other good things on the planet?"

  

Top      

fkaGerry2
                              

Deputy Manager, Sheffield Advice Link
Member since
20th Dec 2005

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 11:03 AM

After my above post I realised that I do have a copy of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists after all; its an e-copy on my computer at home. But its available for free download from the Project Gutenberg website:

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/3608

Read and enjoy! (Better prospect for the weekend than watching Sheffield Wednesday...)

  

Top      

nevip
                              

welfare rights adviser, sefton metropolitan borough council, liverpool.
Member since
22nd Jan 2004

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 12:12 PM

Sheffield who? Lol!

  

Top      

Martin_Williams
                              

Appeals Representative, London Advice Services Alliance- london
Member since
21st Jan 2004

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 11:08 AM

I suppose this thread has 2 issues:

1. Attribution to rightsnet of support for some DWP research:

I can't remember a single rightsnet newstory that was anything other than straightforward reportage (eg so and so has said....., these regulations have been published....).

It is completely unsustainable to say that reporting the DWP press release means it is endorsed by rightsnet.

2. The content of the research:

I am sure that all of the people claiming Industrial Injuries Disablement benefit will be the first to agree that work makes you healthy. You only have to look down the list of occupational diseases to know that work chews you up, removes bits of your body and gives you asbestosis.....



  

Top      

nevip
                              

welfare rights adviser, sefton metropolitan borough council, liverpool.
Member since
22nd Jan 2004

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 12:20 PM

I am lucky enough to have a job that I enjoy and am reasonably well paid for. But I can certainly remember the years after leaning school I spent doing jobs that I hated.

There are many many people engaged in soul destroying, mind numbing, low paid work, bound like slaves to the capitalist yolk, creating wealth for the idle rich. Speak to them about the benefits of work (apart from the money), lack of job satisfaction, stress, no sense of achievement, self medication with alcohol or drugs, strain on personal relationships etc. They would laugh you out of town.

  

Top      

nevip
                              

welfare rights adviser, sefton metropolitan borough council, liverpool.
Member since
22nd Jan 2004

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 12:38 PM

To avoid misunderstanding, the above remarks are aimed at this government and not any of the above contributors to this post. Have a nice day y'all.

  

Top      

Martin_Williams
                              

Appeals Representative, London Advice Services Alliance- london
Member since
21st Jan 2004

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 02:51 PM

Nevip is the "capitalist yolk" a term of art in some dodgy post-trotskyist poultry workers union, or did you mean "yoke"?

(hehe )

  

Top      

nevip
                              

welfare rights adviser, sefton metropolitan borough council, liverpool.
Member since
22nd Jan 2004

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 03:16 PM

Hi Martin. Lol. I asked for that!

Regards

  

Top      

fkaGerry2
                              

Deputy Manager, Sheffield Advice Link
Member since
20th Dec 2005

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 03:37 PM

Think you should still *shell* out for the drinks...specially for being rude about the owls.

  

Top      

nevip
                              

welfare rights adviser, sefton metropolitan borough council, liverpool.
Member since
22nd Jan 2004

RE: What do you think?
Fri 22-Sep-06 04:23 PM

I've got a colleague who can't stop punning. Its driving me to drink so it is. And now its on rightsnet. AAAARGH!

Must go to pub now but I'm sure that the owls will do you proud at the weekend.

All the best
Paul

  

Top      

Top Other benefit issues topic #2153First topic | Last topic