A couple of observations...
The "intention" (to return) must be that of the clmt - not third parties, be they professionals, relatives, or otherwise.
The "intention" must be realistic - a desire is not enough. So, if the clmt can't, in all practicality, return, the "intention" test is not met.
A combination of these two cases may assist and/or be of interest:
Sec of State v Selby DC & Bowman (2006)EWCA Civ 271 www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/271.html
& CSHB/0405/2005 (para 30 - re "intention")
|