In a decision issued at the end of last month, CDLA/145/2006, Commissioner Jacobs discusses the use, as evidence, of observations made at a hearing and holds that -
'If an observation is used purely as confirmation of a conclusion that the tribunal would have reached anyway, there is no need for a tribunal to investigate it further or for the claimant to have a chance to comment on it. However, if an observation is one of the factors taken into account in reaching a conclusion, any failure in the tribunal’s inquisitorial duty or violation of the right to a fair hearing will mean that the decision is wrong in law.'
|