I'm a little behind the times, it must be said, and it's taken me several attempts just to get this post onto rightsnet, but here we go. I've just happened upon the all-new GL24, which raises two questions in my mind :-

1) What bright spark thought reducing the area for the grounds of appeal was a good move?

2) Do they think all appellants are unshaven spotty types, soon put in their place by sceptical men in suits?

http://www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk/JCP/stellent/groups/jcp/documents/websitecontent/dev_012310.pdf

By the looks on their faces the guy in the suit is thinking. 'Are those the grounds for appeal, you're having a laugh aren't ya'! She's thinking 'Its been 2 days and he still hasn't phoned'.

surely the guy on the left is the man from jobcentre plus, interviewing a joint-claim couple?

Thats what we all thought - and if it's good enough for Shawn then it's good enough for us....................