Mon 29-Sep-08 10:09 PM by Kevin D
In my view, much depends on the contractual terms relating to when the clmt is actually employed.
If each period is independently and separately contracted, payment for that period should be attributed to the same period.
If the period of employment covers holidays, whether "paid" or not, I think there are two possible arguments - both with merit. Those methods are:
1) Average the sum of the payments over the period from the start of the contract to the end of the contract; or
2) Treat the person as being in employment, but with earnings changes for holidays being treated as changes in circs (e.g. only average over term time weeks, with nil earnings for holidays).
Depending on the facts, any of the above can be "correct" and none necessarily contradict the regulations cited by nevip.
|