I have an appeal for an A8 national who has failed RTR. The client began working in July 2005 but her first registration certificate was not issued until January 2007 (client says she applied straight away). She had two subsequent jobs, each for less than one year, but greater than 12 months combined, and both registered. In each case, the worker registration certificate was issued more than one month after the start date of employment and in each case the client says she applied for registration immediately. In the sub, the DM says:
if they do not apply for registration within one month of commencing each employment the period of registered work will only be counted from the date the certificate is issued. They are using this to argue that as the date between starting jobs and receiving the WR certificate is greater than one month, the periods of work cannot be linked for the purposes of calculating 12 months registered work. There is no evidence that the DWP have enquired as the date of application of the WR certificates.
The DWP’s sub suggests that a person who applies for registration within a month of starting work, is in registered work from the date employment commences; and in other cases, from the date of issue of the WR certificate. I can't find anything to confirm this last point in the IS reg 21AA, the Accession (I&WR) regs or the 2006 EEA regs;
My view at the moment is that reg 7(2)(b) does indeed treat someone as being in authorised work where they apply for WR certificate within a month of starting but hasn’t received it. 7(2)(c) confirms that worker who has received a valid registration certificate works for an ‘authorised’ employer, but I’m uncertain that this means the certificate is only valid from the date of issue (as the DWP say), because in listing the start date of employment on the certificate, the certificate itself suggests that all of the work is authorised.
What really gets me though, is that if the date of application for the certificate is so important, why on earth didn’t the DWP make some enquires about this? As far as I can see in the bundle, they never even asked the question of the client. This makes me very suspicious that the law is not being applied properly.
I feel sure that I’m missing something…. Can anyone offer any pointers towards a solution? As usual, any and all contributions most appreciated. Thanks,
|