Sorry for the delay in responding but you know what it's like. Yes there was medical report done; but isn't often the case that the medical examiner is guided on what to consider by the information on the IB50 and not to bother with anything else, no matter what the reality is. In this case the claimant ticked the boxes saying no problem with this and that descriptor. As I say, although he did this, he did send a further written statement seperate from, but attached to the IB50 indicating disabilities that the medical examiner and the decision maker apparently decided not to take acoount of. Thus, it would appear, a potential error in point of law. (well I hope so anyway)
|