nevip
welfare rights adviser, sefton metropolitan borough council, liverpool.
Member since 22nd Jan 2004
|
RE: DLA AND PROFOUND DEAFNESS.
Mon 19-Sep-05 10:56 AM |
It is absolutely worth going ahead with the appeal. Her husband alerting her is attention in connection with the bodily function of communication (the substitution priniple - see Mallinson, Fairey - he acting as a substitute for her impaired hearing).
The attention, of course, will need to be reasonably required. So, for instance, if her husband has to get up for work each morning and thus needs as much sleep as he can get then it may be unreasonable to expect him to get up several times a night to see to the child/children. Even if it was reasonable to expect him to get up then they it would be reasonable to argue that they should take it in turns.
However,the mother's attention needs cannot be counted in respect of a child who him/herself gets DLA for the relevant day or night time needs.
|