past caring 1
Welfare Benefits Casework Supervisor, Cambridge House Law Centre, London SE5
Member since 09th Oct 2007
|
RE: tribunal practice
Thu 08-May-08 12:25 PM |
Agree with nevip and would add that I find such "offers" made more frequently by the the more experienced/"fairest" panels - often, I think, it is because tribunals recognise the process of giving evidence is stressful, particularly so for those with mental health problems. Of course, there are dangers in that approach.....
The most bizarre (and utterly unlawful) experience I ever had with such an offer was where I turned up to rep client A and had discovered from the clerk that I was due to appear before the same chair the following day to rep client B. I intended to request an adjournment the following day as I had only just received client B's copious medical records, the previous hearing having been adjourned for these to be provided but TAS, for some unkown reason, having sent them initially to an entirely different advice agency.
This was when I first started out and I wasn't as familiar with procedural regs as I am now...."Ah," I think, "I'll explain tomorrow's situation to the chair, request an adjournment now and save myself and the client the journey." This I did - chair asks me to give the tribunal five minutes (during which time the file is pulled) and I'm invited back in for them to offer HRM and HRC. Now, I know that no higher award could have been made and so client would have had to accept - but the chair also assured me that there would be no problem "pursuading" the two wing members who were actually listed to sit on the tribunal the following day! Possibly - but quite how they proposed to get this one past a PO if they showed up, I can't imagine! ![](images/happy.gif)
|