Right.....
In addition to the cases cited by Chris Smith, the following may also be of interest:
CH/3629/2002 (para 8) CH/0881/2005 CSH/0542/2007 CH/2409/2005 (11 wk delay can be an error)
NB: one of the CD references cited by Chris is incorrectly cited in the circular: CH/0454/2005
In addition, failing to suspend payments while making further enquiries is not necessarily an error:
CSHB/0718/2002 (para 42) CH/0507/2006 CH/0843/2005
All of the above have been sent to Rightsnet today.
As an aside, I agree with Chris' observation about CH/0858/2006 - the Cmmr plainly found that a delay of one month was NOT an error in that particular case.
|