Discussion archive

Top Disability related benefits topic #554

Subject: "IIDB VWF- %" First topic | Last topic
sjm1708
                              

Appeals Worker, DIAL Barnsley
Member since
03rd Mar 2004

IIDB VWF- %
Fri 06-Aug-04 10:35 AM

Hope some one can help me on this. I have never done an appeal for IIDB, so I am a little bit bewildered.

My client has been turned down because examining doctor stated he was not suffering from vwf, however an independant med exam by a professor who specialises in vwf has stated that he does. On his findings he has stated that my client has been assessed as Stage 2 vascular and Stage 3 sensorineural on the Stockholm scale.Both hands are affected 1st 2nd & 3rd fingers are affected to the second joint and the little fingers to the 1st joint.
My question is, for the benefit he has to achieve 14% or more disablement, how does the stockholm scale relate to percentages? is there anywhere that says how you work out the percentage? and can anyone suggest any case law I could use.

I would very much appreciate any comments and help with this....
Cheers

  

Top      

Replies to this topic
RE: IIDB VWF- %, BRIANO, 06th Aug 2004, #1
RE: IIDB VWF- %, northwiltshire, 19th Aug 2004, #2
      RE: IIDB VWF- %, BRIANO, 26th Aug 2004, #3
           RE: IIDB VWF- %, northwiltshire, 27th Aug 2004, #4

BRIANO
                              

welfare rights officer, barnsley welfare rights
Member since
06th Aug 2004

RE: IIDB VWF- %
Fri 06-Aug-04 03:22 PM

In reply to question the issue is not whether the person suffers from the medical condition vibration induced Secondary Raynauds Phenomenon (commonly known as Vibration White Finger) but whether or not the person has the legal condition PDA11 as defied in Part 1 Schedule 1 of the Social Security (Industrial Injuries)(Prescribed Diseases) Regulations 1985.
A negligance claim which is what the report from Professor relates to has to concerns itself with any degree of damage caused by exposure to vibration.
PDA11 is concerned only with the extent of the blanching and its occurence throughout the year.
Two third of three fingers must be effected by blanching (whiteness) and the blanching must occur winter and summer.
At this point in time the nerve damage component of V.W.F is not relevant to a diagnosis of A11, but is relevant to establishing the level of disablement.
There are no test for V.W.F. the test are for vascular damage and then if the person has had exposure to vibration in a work situation then V.W.F. is assumed.
It is important when advising someone on an A11 claim to do a dual pathology check, that is to ensure that there is no instance of any other health issue that could explain the blanching i.e. Primary Raynauds, Diabitis etc.
Important in the medical for an A11 claim is the client giving a good history of the development of the disease.
All to often people overstate their case, V.W.F. has an evolutionary development, it does not suddenly effect 2/3 of three fingers overnight.
Another common problem is that people fail to mention the blanching.
The Stockholm Scale does not relate in any way to the extent to which a person is disabled for D.W.P. purposes.
For instance a person could be 1V and 3SN on the Stockholm scale because the have severe nerve damage but only have blanching on the tips of their fingers.
They have V.W.F., but not A11.
Disablement is based upon a comparison with a person of similar age who does not have V.W.F..
If you wish to discuss this matter further you can bring your client to Wellington House between 08.45 and 12.00noon on a Wednesday.
I am the Senior Welfare Rights Officer who specialises in Industrial Injuries work and apart from being a resource for the rest of the Welfare Rights team I also work closes with the National Union of Mineworkers advising them on Industrial Injuries.

  

Top      

northwiltshire
                              

welfare rights officer, c.a.b. n.wiltshire
Member since
26th Jan 2004

RE: IIDB VWF- %
Thu 19-Aug-04 11:48 AM

Also YOU SHOULD SHE RIGHTSNET NEWS ITEM DATED 20/7/04 WHICH EXPLAINS RECENT CHANGES TO INCLUDE SENSORIAL PROBLEMS NOT JUST BLANCHING.

  

Top      

BRIANO
                              

welfare rights officer, barnsley welfare rights
Member since
06th Aug 2004

RE: IIDB VWF- %
Thu 26-Aug-04 01:57 PM

The news item refered to dated 20/07/2004 was not about a change to the prescription for PDA11; it was about a report published by the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council recommending a change to the prescription.

A number of changes were recommended:
1] A11 to be changed from Vibration White Finger to Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome.
2] Episodic Blanching to be changed to Cold Induced Episodic Blanching.
3] Chain saws used in forestry to be changed to extensive use of chain saws.
and, importantly the prescription be extended to include sensory neural damage - but only at stage 3SN.

No Statutory Instrument has been enacted at this time to change the 1985 Regulations, so the diagnostic question on A11 is still only answered by the claiment having sufficient blanching.

  

Top      

northwiltshire
                              

welfare rights officer, c.a.b. n.wiltshire
Member since
26th Jan 2004

RE: IIDB VWF- %
Fri 27-Aug-04 11:29 AM

Thanks for that Brian I mis read item. As a Ex S.Yorks miner turned down due to no blanching I was about to re-apply. I will now hang fire.

  

Top      

Top Disability related benefits topic #554First topic | Last topic