Discussion archive

Top Disability related benefits topic #2904

Subject: "Case law" First topic | Last topic
Diane P
                              

Caseworker, Perennial - West Yorkshire
Member since
20th Feb 2006

Case law
Wed 22-Feb-06 03:32 PM

I wonder if anyone is aware of any Commissioners Decisions dealing with fluctuating amounts of care needed due to a variable condition?

Also, anything relating to ignoring walking distance when condition becomes exacerbated?

any help much appreciated

Thank you

  

Top      

Replies to this topic
RE: Case law, Margie, 23rd Feb 2006, #1
RE: Case law, Diane P, 23rd Feb 2006, #2
      RE: Case law, ken, 23rd Feb 2006, #3
           RE: Case law, Diane P, 27th Feb 2006, #4

Margie
                              

Senior Welfare Rights Officer, prescot & whiston community advice centre
Member since
13th Apr 2004

RE: Case law
Thu 23-Feb-06 08:08 AM

There are quite a few commissioners decisions on these subjects. Try accessing the Commish website and searching the decisions by subject
http://www.osscsc.org.uk/
....you will have to plough through quite a few but its worth it. Alternatively, get hold of the Derbyshire Training Pack its invaluable for cd's

  

Top      

Diane P
                              

Caseworker, Perennial - West Yorkshire
Member since
20th Feb 2006

RE: Case law
Thu 23-Feb-06 08:22 AM

Thanks for this, have spent about 3 hours so far ploughing through!
Would still appreciate any info if anyone else knows of any

thanks

  

Top      

ken
                              

rightsnet, lasa
Member since
28th Jul 2005

RE: Case law
Thu 23-Feb-06 09:37 AM

The Disability Alliance online DLA/AA case law pack is available here.

Its usefully divided up into relevant subject headings and provides summaries of significant DLA/AA case law dating back to the seventies (and beyond).

In addition, key word searches of DLA decisions in the briefcase area of rightsnet brought the following results -

'majority' - R(DLA)5/05 - in which Chief Commissioner Hickinbottom follows the Court of Appeal in Moyna by holding that the failure to need frequent attention in a given week will not prevent someone satisfying the frequent attention test if they have these needs most weeks over a period of time.

'distance' - CSDLA/554/2005 in which Commissioner Parker held -

'That a claimant suffers severe discomfort at times during his walking does not necessarily mean that he is virtually unable to walk if, overall and having regard to all the relevant factors, he is able to walk to an appreciable extent and in a reasonable way without causing such severe discomfort. Walking achieved only at the expense of severe discomfort is discounted.'




  

Top      

Diane P
                              

Caseworker, Perennial - West Yorkshire
Member since
20th Feb 2006

RE: Case law
Mon 27-Feb-06 02:11 PM

thanks again - i have looked on here and got quite a few good references.

  

Top      

Top Disability related benefits topic #2904First topic | Last topic