Discussion archive

Top Income Support & Jobseeker's Allowance topic #6516

Subject: "Kaczmarek" First topic | Last topic
Dan_manville
                              

Caseworker, Birmingham Tribunal Unit
Member since
08th Jun 2004

Kaczmarek
Tue 13-Jan-09 12:35 PM

Tue 13-Jan-09 12:35 PM by Dan_manville

I've been told that one of my cases is stayed behind Kaczmarek vs Sec State...

I can't find it using the Court Service listings calendar and suspect a spelling mistake on the UT website, however I'm lost as to what to advise my client. Does anyone know the correct name, or possibly even a citation number so I can look it up?

Ta!

  

Top      

Replies to this topic
RE: Kaczmarek, Martin Williams, 14th Jan 2009, #1
RE: Kaczmarek, Dan_manville, 14th Jan 2009, #2
      RE: Kaczmarek, ASH, 14th Jan 2009, #3
           RE: Kaczmarek, Dan_manville, 15th Jan 2009, #4
                RE: Kaczmarek, Dan_manville, 15th Jan 2009, #5
                     RE: Kaczmarek, Gareth Morgan, 15th Jan 2009, #6
                          RE: Kaczmarek, Dan_manville, 15th Jan 2009, #7

Martin Williams
                              

Welfare Rights Advisor, Child Poverty Action Group
Member since
23rd Jul 2008

RE: Kaczmarek
Wed 14-Jan-09 09:44 AM

Thu 15-Jan-09 11:47 AM by shawn

(Edited to shorten link)

Spelling not the problem. It has been decided by CA:

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1310.html

rightsnet news summary is here:

Whether former worker has right to reside under Article 12 or 18 of the EC Treaty: New Court of Appeal judgment

  

Top      

Dan_manville
                              

Caseworker, Birmingham Tribunal Unit
Member since
08th Jun 2004

RE: Kaczmarek
Wed 14-Jan-09 11:56 AM

Well, there's me not paying enough attention then...

Fair puts the boot in to certain arguments about "residing legally" as well.

I've suddenly got a lot of thinking to do!

Cheers Martin.

  

Top      

ASH
                              

Welfare Officer, St Christopher's Hospice, South London
Member since
06th Jan 2005

RE: Kaczmarek
Wed 14-Jan-09 04:26 PM

This all makes my brain ache so am I right to conclude that because of
Council Directive 2004/38/EC any EEA worker will have a right of residence after 5 years in the UK no matter what but not before unless they are working or in certain defined groups.


  

Top      

Dan_manville
                              

Caseworker, Birmingham Tribunal Unit
Member since
08th Jun 2004

RE: Kaczmarek
Thu 15-Jan-09 08:55 AM

The language of the CA might be construed to be rather ambiguous on this point...

For instance, para 5. "In short, her lack of a right to reside (which is not the same as lawful prescence)" juxtaposed against para 23 " provides for a right of permanent residence after 5 years' lawful prescence" would lead me to belive that, unless they've used essentially different meanings for the same language then the door's wide open...

I'll certainly be submitting that today anyways.

  

Top      

Dan_manville
                              

Caseworker, Birmingham Tribunal Unit
Member since
08th Jun 2004

RE: Kaczmarek
Thu 15-Jan-09 08:59 AM

I do hate it when I contradict myself!

  

Top      

Gareth Morgan
                              

Managing Director, Ferret Information Systems, Cardiff
Member since
20th Feb 2004

RE: Kaczmarek
Thu 15-Jan-09 11:26 AM

I always thought that advisors, and particularly representatives, have to follow Lewis Caroll's Red Queen when she says "sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast".

  

Top      

Dan_manville
                              

Caseworker, Birmingham Tribunal Unit
Member since
08th Jun 2004

RE: Kaczmarek
Thu 15-Jan-09 12:04 PM

Well, this morning fortunately it's only two, but having reverted to the first, for very different and entirely possible reasons than CA might comment on I think I'll just duck the question instead...

Pass the aspirin!

  

Top      

Top Income Support & Jobseeker's Allowance topic #6516First topic | Last topic